⚡ Find the Best Battery, Solar Kit, E-Bike or Generator  ·  Capacity, output and cost per watt-hour, side by side

HomePower Stations › Goal Zero Yeti 700

Goal Zero Yeti 700 Review

677Wh of storage, 182W continuous output, LiFePO4 cells. Listed at $699.95 at Goal Zero.

The Goal Zero Yeti 700 is a portable 600 1,200wh unit holding 677Wh. At $1.03 per watt-hour it is priced above the median for the band, so you are paying a premium over comparable capacity. It uses LiFePO4 cells rated for 4,000 cycles, so it is built to be kept rather than replaced.

Price and stock are shown on Amazon. We may earn a commission, which never changes what the figures say.

What the numbers work out to
$1.03
per watt-hour
Purchase price divided by rated capacity. The standard way to compare cost across sizes.
33.3
Wh per pound
Energy density. What decides whether you will actually carry it.
25.8¢
per kWh over its life
Price divided by the energy it can deliver across 4,000 rated cycles. Compare it to what your utility charges.

Computed from this unit’s published specification, not from a manufacturer claim. Method and the full catalogue comparison are in our power station price index.

What the Goal Zero Yeti 700 will run, and for how long

Runtimes below are calculated from the 677Wh rated capacity, derated to 85% for AC loads and 92% for USB and 12V loads to cover inverter and conversion losses. They are arithmetic, not lab measurements, but they are the same arithmetic applied to every unit we track, so the comparison holds. Anything drawing more than the 182W continuous rating is left off the list because this unit cannot carry it.

LoadEstimated runtime
Phone charge (12Wh)51 charges
Wi-Fi router (10W)58 hr
LED work light (10W)62 hr
CPAP, humidifier off (40W)14 hr 23 min
Laptop (60W)9 hr 35 min
12V portable fridge (45W avg)12 hr 47 min
55-inch TV (90W)6 hr 24 min

Real figures land below these. A fridge cycles rather than drawing continuously, and cold weather costs a lithium pack usable capacity, so treat the table as the ceiling rather than the expectation.

Charging and power delivery

Maximum solar input is 200W. At 70% of that rating, which is what a fixed panel realistically delivers across a good day, a full charge from empty is roughly 4 hr 50 min of usable sun.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 specifications

Manufacturer figures, gathered so you can read them against everything else we track rather than against the marketing page they came from.

Capacity677Wh
Continuous AC output182W
Cell chemistryLiFePO4
Rated cycle life4,000 cycles
Weight20.3 lb
Max solar input200W
Warranty5 years
Price at Goal Zero$699.95
Cost per watt-hour$1.03

How the Goal Zero Yeti 700 compares

The closest units we track from other manufacturers in the same band, matched on capacity rather than on price.

  Goal Zero Yeti 700 Jackery Explorer 700 Plus Jackery 700 Plus
Capacity 677Wh 680Wh 681Wh
Output 182W 1,000W 1,000W
Cycle life 4,000 cycles 4,000 cycles
Weight 20 lb 22 lb
Price $699.95 $599 $999
Cost per watt-hour $1.03 $0.88 $1.47

Put it head to head →

Where the Goal Zero Yeti 700 sits in its band

We track 57 units in the portable 600 1,200wh band with both a price and a published capacity. They run from $179 to $3,449, and from 99Wh to 5,040Wh. On cost per watt-hour the Goal Zero Yeti 700 ranks 46 of 57, where 1 is the cheapest capacity in the band. That puts it in the most expensive third, so it has to earn the difference somewhere other than raw capacity. Ranking on cost per watt-hour deliberately ignores build quality, port selection and warranty, so read it as one input rather than as the answer.

Alternatives to the Goal Zero Yeti 700

Units we track in the same band that are close enough to be genuine substitutes, matched on capacity. Each links to its own review.

  • Jackery Explorer 700 Plus review — 680Wh, 1,000W output, listed at $599, $0.88 per watt-hour, cheaper capacity than the Goal Zero Yeti 700.
  • Jackery 700 Plus review — 681Wh, 1,000W output, listed at $999, $1.47 per watt-hour, dearer capacity than the Goal Zero Yeti 700.
  • Jackery Explorer 600 v2 review — 640Wh, 500W output, listed at $429, $0.67 per watt-hour, cheaper capacity than the Goal Zero Yeti 700.
  • Jackery 600 v2 review — 640Wh, 500W output, listed at $599, $0.94 per watt-hour, cheaper capacity than the Goal Zero Yeti 700.

Who the Goal Zero Yeti 700 suits

It is a sensible buy for van and car camping, a long weekend off-grid, and covering a fridge plus lighting and devices through a day-long outage. It is the wrong tool for whole-home backup, and sustained use of a microwave or a kettle.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 questions

How long will the Goal Zero Yeti 700 run a fridge?

A full-size fridge averages about 50W once you account for the compressor cycling on and off. From 677Wh, derated to 85% for inverter losses, that is roughly 11 hr 31 min on a full charge. A 12V portable fridge draws less and will run considerably longer.

Can the Goal Zero Yeti 700 be charged by solar?

Yes. It accepts up to 200W of solar input. Panels rarely hit their rated figure in the field, so plan on about 70% of the panel rating across a clear day.

What warranty does the Goal Zero Yeti 700 carry?

Goal Zero covers it for 5 years, and rates the cells for 4,000 charge cycles. Cycle life and warranty are different promises, and the cycle figure is the one that tells you how long the pack stays useful.

Is the Goal Zero Yeti 700 worth it?

At $699.95 it works out at $1.03 per watt-hour. It costs more per watt-hour than the median unit in its band, so the case for it rests on the features rather than on the price. Read the comparison table above against the two closest rivals before deciding.

How we assess these

Every figure on this page comes from the manufacturer, and every derived number, cost per watt-hour and estimated runtime, is calculated the same way for all 437 products we track. That is what makes the comparison meaningful: we are not scoring units against a private impression of them, we are putting published figures side by side and doing the arithmetic in public. Where a manufacturer stays quiet, we say so rather than filling the gap.

Scroll to Top